We Bite Back

Seriously? Potential trigger warning for sexual abuse
Page 1 of 1

Author:  Spender [ Mon Oct 15, 2012 2:33 am ]
Post subject:  Seriously? Potential trigger warning for sexual abuse

This is from a Jezebel post, but I am not including the URL because it contains links to an article that is simply antiquated and triggering on issues related to weight. The post, however, is about an "anti-food activist" (yeah, you read that right), who likens food enjoyment to rape.

Anti-Obesity Activist MeMe Roth Compares Eating To Rape

This weekend, anti-obesity activist MeMe Roth took her anti-food, anti-human rhetoric across the Atlantic in an interview with the Guardian — and sounded more crazed than ever.

MeMe Roth has made her name "calling people fat" (example: Jordin Sparks) and throwing away ice cream toppings at her kid's YMCA. But that name is in fact "a brand extension." Her real name is Meredith Clements, but she uses MeMe, her great-grandmother's name, because it expresses her goal to "change the cultural MeMes that have ushered in this era of obesity." MeMe is a pretty strange name for someone who thinks our culture is self-absorbed, but, as the Guardian's admirably hard-hitting Gaby Wood reveals, Roth isn't too good at analysis, of herself or anyone else.

When Wood asks Roth whether government food subsidies play a role in rising obesity rates, Roth replies that "high fructose corn syrup" is the real enemy here — which is sort of like believing that the evil oil creature in FernGully is responsible for global warming. Even more wacked-out — and downright offensive — is this statement:

The defence has been made in the case of sex criminals that there is pleasure on the part of the victim. The same is true with what we're doing with food. We may abuse our bodies with food, but it's incredibly pleasurable. From a food marketer's point of view, when your quote unquote victim is so willing and enjoying of the process, who's fighting back?

Anyone who thinks eating is like being raped probably has some serious food issues. Although Roth swears she's never been anorexic, or even been on a diet, her relationship to food and body image is clearly a pretty diseased one. She talks about being ashamed of her "fat" mother when she was in kindergarten, as though this shame were normal and appropriate. She also insists that Wood meet her "after lunch" at one p.m. When Wood asks what she actually ate for lunch, this exchange ensues:

She squirms visibly. "You're taking me where I don't want to go ... What works for me doesn't work for a lot of people."

Well, you've said that, I insist, so taking that into account: lunch? Roth hesitates. "I discovered when I was in college that I work best when I get a workout in and eat after that. Sometimes I'll delay when I eat until I get a workout in. But I don't let a whole day go by without running four miles."

OK, I go on, but supposing you couldn't work out until four o'clock in the afternoon - would you not eat until after that?

"I might."

I look at my watch. It's 3.30pm. Alarm bells start to ring in my head. How about today, I ask. Have you eaten at all today?

Roth is a little quiet.

"No," she says.

There is a pause.

"But I feel great!"

Roth may not be anorexic, and she may not think of what she does as dieting, but if "what works for her" is not eating anything until after 3:30, she's right that it's not going to work for most people. Nor should it. To liken the pleasure one gets from food to something as toxic as sexual assault isn't just illogical and insensitive — it also demonizes something that nourishes, brings people together, and produces some of the greatest and most uncomplicated joy in life. Rather than accept food for what it is — something that, like many good things, is wonderful in moderation and problematic in excess — Roth wants people to think of it as some kind of evil rapist who will make us fat and therefore shameful. It's a judgmental, unhealthy, and ultimately unsustainable way to live.

Author:  katemaree [ Mon Oct 15, 2012 6:53 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Seriously? Potential trigger warning for sexual abuse

I read the article and my first response was that I was quite offended and shocked by her comments and then I started wondering, what has she been through to liken s.abuse/rape to food? And to continue to restrict and exercise?

Author:  eniebee [ Fri Oct 26, 2012 5:18 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Seriously? Potential trigger warning for sexual abuse

I totally get your point x!
I didn't read it all as I couldn't get my way through it!

Author:  Fishbulb [ Sat Nov 03, 2012 12:56 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Seriously? Potential trigger warning for sexual abuse

Christ. That hurt to read. How can someone compare eating, one of life's most natural functions, to sexual abuse, which is totally unnatural?

I mean I understand finding it difficult to eat, and being scared of eating, but she says that it's because eating is evil...and she claims to not have a problem?

I did like the FernGully reference, that was my favourite film as a child

Author:  eniebee [ Mon Nov 05, 2012 7:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Seriously? Potential trigger warning for sexual abuse

I know ! Its wrong .

Author:  lou [ Mon Mar 25, 2013 4:53 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Seriously? Potential trigger warning for sexual abuse

If you ask me she needs psychological help not "branding". How damaging her words and actions are is just unbelievable

Author:  Persephone [ Mon Mar 25, 2013 5:22 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Seriously? Potential trigger warning for sexual abuse

I read this last year and it's still as shocking reading it again. She has serious issue with food and though she might deny having an eating disorder, her eating behaviour is clearly disordered. But more shocking is her lack of understanding about rape. Really wish she didn't get so much publicity.

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 4 hours
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group